|
|
The
Gypsy goddess of Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer
Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer,
the ‘Saint Marys of the Sea’, used to be a small fishing
village located on the French Mediterranean coast. Today, it is
best known as the destination of thousands of “gypsies”,
who annually come to the seaside resort to worship the statue
of a Christian saint, Sara. But who is she?
Philip Coppens
Archaeological
excavations and local legends indicate that the site of Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer
has been venerated as a holy place from prehistoric times; it
retained its holiness with the Celts, Romans and Christians. In
Celtic times, the town had a holy spring and was known as the
Oppidum Priscum Ra. Worship to the triple water deity Matres co-existed
with and was later superseded by Roman temples dedicated to Artemis,
Cybele, Isis and Mithras. Of course, Christianity “adopted”
these sacred sites and historical sources mention a church from
the 9th century onwards, though the town only truly made a regular
appearance in historical accounts from the 14th century onwards.
However, one local legend has grandiosely tried to fill the gap
between 400 BC and 900 AD by stating that Mary Magdalene, Mary
Salome, Mary Jacob, Lazarus and several other disciples such as
Maximus and Sidonius – many of them present at the Crucifixion
of Christ – were forced, in 45 AD, to flee the Holy Land
by boat. Mary Salome was the mother of James, son of Zebedee and
Mary Jacob the sister or cousin of the Virgin Mary. Following
a perilous journey, their boat – equipped without sail and
therefore destined to perish at sea – miraculously crossed
the Mediterranean Sea, coming ashore near Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer,
where the passengers disembarked.
According to legend, Saint Martha went to Tarascon, where, by
showing the sign of the cross, she appeased the monster Tarasque
that used to rise out of the waters of the Rhone to devour children
and livestock. Mary Magdalene headed for Sainte Baume, where she
supposedly spent the remaining days of her life in a desolate
cave, clothed only by her own, long hair. Lazarus went to Marseille
and became its first bishop and Maximinus to Aix. In short, the
Christianisation of France was said to have occurred by prominent
witnesses of what Christianity saw as the greatest event of all
times: the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ. But it
is two women, Mary Salome and Mary Jacob, who remained in the
area where the boat had come ashore and who became, in time, objects
of veneration to the local people.
According
to some sources, the village now known as Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer
was originally known as Ratis, which means “raft”
in Latin, and later, the church itself, which is shaped like a
boat, was for some time known as Notre Dame de Ratis (Our Lady
of the Raft). It is a direct reference to the boat that brought
these saints to France. Indeed, only in the 19th century did the
town become officially known as Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer, though
locals had called it as such for several centuries.
Though seen as holy, it is only in recent centuries that the town
has stood out, solely due to the devotion by the gypsies. And
their devotion is not towards these two saints, but to a third:
Sara(h). The question, however, is: who is she? She was after
all apparently not one of the people on that boat.
A
lot – and a lot of nonsense – has been written about
the gypsies. As a minority group, they have often been avoided,
scorned, chased away, persecuted, killed or spoken ill of. To
a large extent, the gypsies are still seen as a mysterious people
and it is probably true to say that they are special in Europe
as they have largely held on to a nomadic lifestyle to this very
day.
But it is their religion that some consider to be their biggest
enigma. Some have claimed the gypsies never reveal a single detail
about their belief. Some have claimed they worship Mary Magdalene
and that it is this reason why they annually gather here. Both
claims are, however, utter nonsense.
What is true, is that the gypsies come to Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer
once a year. At the core of the appeal of the town – and
the destination of their pilgrimage – is a fortified Romanesque
church, which dates from the 12th century. It is in its crypt
that we find the actual centre of the gypsy devotion: a statue
of Saint Sarah, known to the gypsies as Sara-la-Kali, whose origin
and identity are for many people still a mystery. Several legends
about who she is nevertheless do exist.
One legend claims that the gypsies believe that Sarah was a powerful
local queen who welcomed the tired travellers from the Holy Land,
while other sources suggest she may have been an ancient pagan
goddess – a Black Madonna? – or a black Egyptian woman
that was the servant of Christ’s mother Mary. Christians
preferred to see her as an unexpected passenger on the boat. The
adapted legend goes that while the Romans set the boat adrift
in the Holy Island, Sarah apparently begged to be taken with them.
A miracle enabled her to reach the boat by walking on the water,
using Mary Salome’s cloak as a type of magical carpet by
which she was able to reach the boat.
The
so-called “Pelerinage des Gitans”, or the Pilgrimage
of the Gypsies, occurs annually on May 24 and 25. The gypsies
look upon the festival as a time of religious worship as well
as a time to meet up with friends and relatives.
On the afternoon of May 24, the statues of the two Marys, stored
in a wooden box, are lowered from their storage high in the upper
Saint Michael’s church. As the relics are lowered, some
hold up babies, as the belief goes that to touch the relics before
they reach the ground is to receive a wondrous healing and protection
from misfortune. After the statues of the two Marys have been
revealed from their containers, the statue of Sarah is brought
up from the crypt below. She is carried on the shoulders of four
gypsies, on a procession to the nearby sandy beach. On the beach,
the party – surrounded by hundreds of pilgrims – wade
knee-deep into the water, to turn around and return the statue
to the church, where the three saints are venerated for the remainder
of the day.
The following morning, the statues of the two Marys are placed
in a bark and are, on their turn, taken to the sea, returned and
worshipped. At first sight, the procession seems to be a theatrical
rendition of the legend of how the saints’ bark came ashore
here; but why are the three saints not taken to the sea together,
on the same day?
What is less known, is that the festival actually has a slightly
less popular third day, when there is the “abrivado”,
in memory of the Marquis de Baroncelli, who helped the local people.
Folco de Baroncelli was born in Aix in 1869, of an aristocratic
Florentine family, and soon developed a love of bulls. He settled
in the Camargue in 1895, founding the Manando Santenco near Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer.
He codified the activities of the gypsies and promoted minority
rights. He was the one who won the right for the gypsies to honour
Sarah publicly. In his honour, bulls are driven through the streets,
while the crowd tries to let the bulls escape from their predetermined
course. Even less known is that there is a second pilgrimage on
the weekend closest to October 22, when the reliquaries of the
two Marys are once again taken down and are taken down to the
sea. For this festival, Sarah remains inside her crypt.
So
what is it that attracted the gypsies here? What is so special
about Sarah that thousands of gypsies, from all over Europe, come
to this area?
First of all, it is not known when and why the local church became
so sacred to the gypsies, but what is know, is that it was some
time after the gypsies’ arrival in Europe in the early 1400s.
Likely, the devotion occurred after René d’Anjou
gave the order to excavate an oratory – where the two Marys
were allegedly buried – in December 1448. The crypt –
in which Saint Sarah stands – dates from the time of these
excavations. The excavations indeed revealed several human heads
arranged in the form of a cross and the bodies of two women. An
altar of compacted earth was also found, as well as a smooth marble
stone that was later to be called “the Saints’ pillow”,
currently visible inside the church.
The discovery was the proof required to claim that the two bodies
were the two Marys, and King René put Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer
on the pilgrim map. At a ceremony in the presence of King René
and Queen Isabelle, the relics were piously placed in the two
reliquaries and stored in the upper chapel above the main altar.
Though the reliquaries themselves were destroyed at the time of
the Revolution, the local priesthood had apparently the foresight
to secure the relics inside, so that after the Revolution, merely
two new reliquaries had to be made, and the bones reinserted in
them. Though by 1797, everything was therefore ready, the procession
through the streets only recommenced in 1862.
Though this explains the problem of the Marias, it is clear that
there were no bones of Sarah – and it is her statue, not
her relics, that is so paramount in the annual procession. Furthermore,
the present statue is clearly of quite recent origin and would,
in a line-up of Christian statues, not stand out. It is said that
this statue is only the most recent in a series, but when the
first was made, is again an unknown.
So
why Sarah? For some, it is because she is “in truth”
a Black Madonna and – so the thinking goes – the gypsies
must be into the worship of the Black Madonna. Noting that some
people argue that the Black Madonna was in truth Mary Magdalene,
we understand how that theory came about.
After the publication of “Holy Blood, Holy Grail”,
in which it is postulated that Jesus not only had descendents,
but that they lived in France, their blood merging with the Merovingian
dynasty, some authors, like Margaret Starbird and Tim Wallace-Murphy
posited that Sarah was actually the daughter of Mary Magdalene
and Jesus.
Others – less controversially – argue that in The
Legend of the Saintes-Maries, written in 1521, Vincent Philippon
writes that Sarah travelled through the Camargue to provide for
the needs of a small Christian community. Thus, the practice of
begging for alms performed by Sarah gave early writers a reason
to make Sarah into a patron goddess of the gypsies – and
hence why they would have such a devotion to her.
Alas, the truth is much more intriguing. Just like the Christians
put a Christian veneer on pagan traditions, so the gypsies put
a gypsy veneer on Christianity. “Sarah-la-Kali”, sometimes
translated as Sarah the Black, was really a reference to the Hindu
goddess Kali.
First
of all, we should note that the origins of the gypsies are no
longer a mystery. We know that they left India as a group of nomads
around 900 AD, reached Persia in 950, and were in Egypt by 1230.
By 1370 the gypsies, or Gitans, were in France and it is said
that they were in the Camargue in 1438 – around the time
of the excavations carried out by René d’Anjou.
India, of course, has a Hindu goddess known as Kali. Kali is represented
as black – which would have greatly helped the confusion
with identifying Sarah as a Black Madonna – which, to a
large extent, Kali is indeed. In fact, like the Virgin Mary, she
is also revered as Bhavatarini, literally “redeemer of the
universe”, though in origin, she was a figure of annihilation,
comparable to the Egyptian goddess Sekhmet. But from her violent
origins, Kali has now evolved into a type of benign Mother Goddess.
Could it be that her worship was simply pasted onto Sarah, to
become “Sarah the Kali”? Ronald Lee has performed
a lot of work on this subject and has come to the conclusion that
this is indeed the likeliest conclusion – supported by testimony
given by the gypsies themselves – who, if you ask, are actually
not at all reluctant to speak about their religion.
First
of all, Lee notes that contrary to what some claim, the worship
of Sarah at Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer is not unique. Similar statues
were worshipped by the gypsies in Eastern Europe. He states: “These
rituals include laying flowers at the feet of the statue, adorning
the statue with clothing of the sick hoping for cures, placing
requests to the statue, and lighting candles to the female divinity.
To the Roma [the gypsies], Kali Sara is the Protectress who will
cure sickness, bring good luck and fertility and grant success
in business ventures.” Lee added that all of these ceremonies
included carrying a statue into the nearest body of water, whereby
the bark was also lowered into the water – like at Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer.
Experts in Hindu mythology have confirmed that these Romani festivals
are indeed identical to the ceremony of the Durga Pooja of India,
where the statue of the Goddess is carried into a body of water
too. The only difference is that the statue is immersed into it,
the immersion destroying the statue itself. It is clear that this
might have been one step too far for the Christian community who
participate in the “Sarah festival”. Hence the rather
odd tradition of Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer of carrying a statue
knee-deep in water, and just return – which to all involved
seems to feel like there is something missing.
Durga
Puja is the biggest festival of the Hindus in Bengal and is also
known as Akalbodhan, Vijaya Dashami, Dashain, and Dussehra. There,
the festival occurs in the autumn, from the sixth to tenth day
of the waxing moon in the month of Ashwin, which is the sixth
month in the Bengali calendar. However, the goddess was traditionally
worshipped in the spring, but due to contingencies of battle,
Rama had to invoke her in the autumn. Today, the festival is therefore
held in the autumn, although the spring puja, known as Basanti
Puja, is still present in the Hindu almanac. Like the festival
of Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer, religion takes a backseat and it
is largely a carnival, where people come together to enjoy themselves.
If there are still any doubters, the goddess Kali in Hindu is
also known as Sara. Finally, Lee’s research in other countries,
including interviews with the gypsies themselves, has confirmed
that the gypsies were aware that “Sara-la-Kali” was
in truth Kali. He
noted that Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer is not the only location where
the gypsies have adopted a Christian saint: in Mexico, Mexican
gypsies attend the festival of The Virgin of Guadalupe, which
enables them to worship a female divinity sponsored by the Church
– even though in truth she is another substitute for Kali.
He concluded: “Roma all over the world continue to worship
female deities or saints in shrines located near bodies of water,
honouring them with ceremonies that come not from Christianity
but from Hinduism.” But with greater religious liberty at
the end of the 20th century, in 1998, the first Kali Sara festival
was held in Vancouver and in 2001, a statue of her was created
for her worship in Toronto.
The
cult of Sarah is therefore not a remnant of some pagan or secret
Christian tradition. Saintes-Maries-de-la-Mer was seen by the
gypsies as a safe-haven, a location where they could practice
their home-grown festivals within the comfort of a newly invented
myth, that of Sarah. That she is a very adaptable goddess is made
evident in recent years, seeing how – in so many books,
especially since and with the publication of Dan Brown’s
The Da Vinci Code, she has been transformed into the daughter
of Jesus. Sarah is therefore currently being hijacked by the New
Age community, but perhaps the gypsies, seeing how they are externalising
their worship of Kali, might soon reclaim it for the Hindu deity
she always was.
|