The following document is an investigation into the John F. Kennedy assassination and was written in early 1993, reflecting the contemporary knowledge. Parts of the material were used in front of a US government enquiry into whether or not to hold a new investigation into the assassination of president Kennedy. Though in the end they did not, the following document reveals large inconsistencies in the official investigations.

The scope of the document is to analyse the available evidence from a legal perspective, specifically focusing on the chain of evidence. It is argued that the evidence often had no chain of evidence attached to it. This means that the evidence presented to the Warren Commission would not be admitted into a court of law. The Warren Commission sidestepped this issue by declaring that the then already dead Lee Harvey Oswald was insane - a legal loophole, as for insanity verdicts, the chain of evidence is not a legal requirement... thus providing the Warren Commission with a safety net to "authoratively state" that Oswald was the assassin.

Once the evidence has been analysed, it is reassembled in such manner that it points towards the true culprits behind the crime, as well as the framework that allowed the assassination to occur.

Document in PDF format, paper format A4 (1.7 MB)

Document in PDF format, paper format US Letter (1.9 MB)